The admission line of each province is different. Some people think that this is unfair to all candidates. They think it is necessary to unify the national examination paper and implement the same admission score line. Today, let's say that if the national unified examination paper is really realized, what will happen? I sorted out why the college entrance examination can not be a national volume, for reference only.
Why can't the college entrance examination be a national exam
01.
With different economic development, it is difficult to balance educational resources
Some netizens believe that it is unrealistic to unify the admission score line if we want to realize the national unified volume, because from the current situation of our country, the economic development of each place is different, and the distribution of local educational resources is also very uneven.
Education is not only a simple problem, but also involves a series of problems, including social division of labor, security, living standards and environment.
In fact, many provinces in China are also trying to implement the national unified college entrance examination volume, but it is basically impossible to achieve the national unified admission score line.
Because the existing distribution of educational resources in China is that the resources in the eastern coastal areas are much better than those in the western remote areas. Whether it is teachers, teaching equipment or educational ideas, the students in the eastern coastal areas obviously have more advantages than those in the western remote areas, which makes it difficult to realize the unified admission score line.
After the college entrance examination every year, many parents and candidates in major provinces complain that it is too difficult and unfair to themselves. However, if you really realize the national unified admission score, will you send your children to universities in the west?
Therefore, the elder sister felt that instead of complaining about injustice, she might as well make good use of her existing advantageous resources and break her own way in her own province.
02.
Unified admission score line may not be fair
Because now some places in the domestic college entrance examination will adopt the form of independent proposition, and some people also think they are unfair to candidates. In fact, it is a good wish to unify the admission score line and the college entrance examination paper, but it may not be fair once it is realized.
As we mentioned earlier, the current situation of education in China is the uneven distribution of resources between the eastern coastal areas and the remote areas in the west, which has always been a problem in China and has a great relationship with local economic development.
Imagine, if you are a candidate in a remote area in the west, do you still think it is fair to realize the national unified examination paper and admission score line? In this case, some examinees who have lived in a lack of educational resources since childhood are not competitive at all.
Finally, there may be a situation that candidates in remote areas in the west can not be admitted to good universities, while many students in the East can go to good universities. In the long run, this will further affect the local economic development and lead to more imbalance between the East and the West.
In fact, according to the current situation in China, the current college entrance examination system is relatively fair. The test papers and admission scores of each province are different, so that candidates in the west can be admitted to their favorite schools and become more competitive, so as to reduce the unfairness caused by the uneven distribution of resources.
03.
Different admission scores
In order to achieve the differentiation of enrollment
Some examinees also believe that if the country wants to implement the national unified volume, the difficulty is not as big as we think, because all regions of the country implement the unified syllabus, and everyone learns the same things.
Moreover, a few years before the resumption of the college entrance examination in our country, the national unified college entrance examination volume has been implemented. Although Shanghai began to pilot independent proposition later, other provinces in the country still unified the college entrance examination volume for a long time.
But in fact, some things are not whether they can be realized, but whether they want to.
Up to now, China's college entrance examination has implemented the provincial plan of enrollment, and the number of students enrolled by each student and even the number of students in each major are formulated in advance. Therefore, only when the admission score line is different or different college entrance examination papers are implemented, can the differentiation of enrollment be achieved and real talents be selected.
04.
Fairness is relative
There are differences between high and low strength
Some netizens think that realizing the national unified volume is a beautiful but infeasible idea. Because the educational resources of each place are different, there are many strong educational provinces along the eastern coast, and of course, there are many weak provinces and schools lacking resources in the western region.
If the national unified volume is implemented, it is actually unfair. As we said, fairness is relative, so is education. There are also differences between high and low, strong and weak.
05.
Region and development level
It is difficult to achieve unity
There are two main reasons why it is difficult to unify the national unified college entrance examination paper and the unified admission score line discussed by us:
[different regions]
As we all know, our country is a country with many different national cultures. There are not only regional differences, but also regional culture and educational resources. Candidates will also be affected by them. Therefore, the contents of the test questions need to be different.
[different development levels]
As we have said before, the different level of economic development in each place will also affect the local education level. The economic foundation determines the superstructure. Educational resources are unfair, and the implementation of a unified volume will be even more unfair.
06.
Unbalanced economic development should not
Become the reason why the national volume cannot be unified
Some netizens also agree that if unified admission is realized, few students in Xinjiang and Tibet may be able to enter the University, but they think this is not enough to explain this problem.
They feel that other measures can be taken to solve this problem, reduce the same problems in various provinces, and then balance the proportion of admission. For some places with relatively backward education level, they can achieve a balance by investing more admission proportion. If the regional economic development is unbalanced, they feel that the national volume should not be unified, which can not stand scrutiny.
07.
Explanation of the Minister of Education
Why not use the national unified volume for the college entrance examination
From the views of netizens, let's take a look at the views of the Ministry of education on realizing the national unified volume.
As some netizens said, China did use the national unified college entrance examination volume for a period of time, but later, because of the actual situation, it also implemented the reform, mainly because it was necessary to implement the provincial college entrance examination reform, and the pilot time of provinces was different. Therefore, in order to meet the needs of the reform, the country did not implement the unified college entrance examination volume.
Another reason is that there is a great security risk in the implementation of the unified college entrance examination paper, because once a test paper is leaked, the whole progress of the college entrance examination will be shelved, and millions of candidates across the country will also be affected.
Finally, although the syllabus of teaching materials in each province is similar, the teaching materials are not unified, and the reform of college entrance examination is not the same. Therefore, when each province makes its own college entrance examination proposition, it will also be carried out according to its own actual situation and education mode.
As for whether the national college entrance examination unified volume will be implemented in the future, it also depends on the achievements and trends of the college entrance examination reform.
So
What do the deputies and members think of this issue
Wang Zhigang, deputy to the National People's Congress and President of Hebei Agricultural University, said
▼
Under the same standard and scale, everyone reflects the level of their test scores, which is conducive to promoting the fairness of the college entrance examination to a certain extent. However, one volume of the college entrance examination can not solve the problem of educational equity. In fact, the key is the enrollment plan.
Xu Jiang, deputy to the National People's Congress and President of China Academy of Fine Arts
▼
In the proposition of college entrance examination, the "local characteristics" of each province can be properly maintained. China should have this kind of test paper with different contents to maintain a unified level. There is no need to unify it. This is not the most critical issue.
We note that both representatives mentioned that "this is not the most critical issue". In the final analysis, the proposal of "one volume of the college entrance examination" is only a way and path to try to implement the reform of the college entrance examination and promote educational equity, not an end. So, is it feasible to implement the "national one volume" now? What should we pay attention to at the operational level? Can this promote educational equity?
Huang Dekuan, member of the CPPCC National Committee and professor of Anhui University
▼
Unified college entrance examination is a complex and systematic problem, which can not be solved by a simple test paper. On the surface, it is fair to unify the college entrance examination, one level and one test paper to select excellent students. But on the other hand, because of the differences in education levels across the country, there are also unfair aspects of an examination paper.
Chen Jingying, deputy to the National People's Congress and vice president of Shanghai Institute of Finance
▼
It is difficult to implement the "one volume of college entrance examination" immediately, and a transition period is needed. There should be a transition period, such as national enrollment. Students come from different examination areas and use different examination papers. Higher mathematics adopts graded teaching, which can not be divided into classes directly according to the score of the college entrance examination. There should be such a corresponding admission policy for colleges and universities.
Huang De, member of the CPPCC National Committee
▼
We should give priority to improving the overall level of education in all localities, and then make an article on the selection examination. It is also necessary to improve the overall level of education in various places and build several first-class universities in local areas. The gap between first-class universities and the first-class universities in the country as a whole should be gradually narrowed, and then create a fair mechanism in examination and selection as much as possible.
Gong Ke, deputy to the National People's Congress and President of Nankai University, further proposed
▼
Under the current situation of quota admission by province, "one volume of college entrance examination" will not bring substantive changes to college entrance examination admission. It is of more far-reaching significance to explore the reform of enrollment according to major and enrollment according to unified college entrance examination, academic level test and comprehensive quality evaluation. Compared under a unified scale, it is possible to lay a foundation for the redistribution of enrollment resources across provinces in the future. The current policy focus is still to ensure that education in underdeveloped areas go to universities, especially the proportion of key universities should be increased.